CONSTITUTIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON GREEN TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE IN THE CONTEXT OF INTERNATIONAL PRACTICE

Keywords: constitution, constitutional mechanisms for the protection of human rights, constitutional legal order, transitional justice, environmental rights, “green” transitional justice, environmental constitutionalism

Abstract

The article aims to examine the concept of “green” transitional justice, constitutional, national, and inter- national approaches to “green” examine transitional justice, and to develop general recommendations for the regulatory framework of “green” transitional justice at the state level. The article employs several research methods, specifi cally the dialectical method, which is used to trace the historical and socio-legal development of the concept of “green” transitional justice; the comparative legal method and the method of analysis are used to study international experience in the implemention of “green” transitional justice. Results. The article analyzes international experience, practical precedents, and constitutional mechanisms for overcoming environmental damage during and after armed confl ict, which may be eff ective for Ukraine at various stages of peacebuilding processes. The study examines the experience of environmental constitutionalism relevant to Ukraine, which provides for environmental protection as an integral part of the constitutional order, and mechanisms for restoring justice for Ukrainian communities, in particular Ukrainian villages as centers of national identity. Conclusions. Emphasis is placed on the need to reconsider classical institutions of transitional justice – particularly reparations, truth-seeking initiatives, the implementation of institutional reforms, and the devel- opment of memory policies – from the perspective of integrating the principles of “green” transitional justice into the constitutional architecture of the State, with due regard to the protection of the right to a healthy environment. The concept of “green” transitional justice has been developed as part of environmental constitutionalism and a component of the constitutional legal order. It involves combining the structures and approaches inherent in traditional transitional justice with the introduction of mechanisms for recognizing and responding to damage caused to nature, people, communities, and societies in each of them.

References

1. Lujala P., Rustad S. High-value Natural Resources: A Blessing or a Curse for Peace? // Sustainable Development Law & Policy. 2011. Vol. 12, № 1. P. 19–22.
2. UNEP. From Confl ict to Peacebuilding: The Role of Nat- ural Resources and the Environment. U.N. Doc. DEP/1079/GE, U.N. Sales No. 09.III.D.14. 2009.
3. Cusato E. International law, the paradox of plenty and the making of resource-driven confl ict // Leiden Journal of International Law. 2020. Vol. 33, № 3. P. 649–666.
4. Asmeret Asefaw Berhe. The Contribution of Landmines to Land Degradation // Land Degradation and Development. 2007. Vol. 18, № 1. P. 1–15.
5. Lawrence M. J., Stemberger H. L.J., Zolderdo A. J., Struthers D. P., Cooke S. J. The eff ects of modern war and military activities on biodiversity and the environment // Environmental Reviews. 2015. Vol. 23, № 4. P. 443–460.
6. Conca K., Wallace J. Environment and Peacebuilding in War-torn Societies: Lessons from the UN Environment Programme’s Experience with Post-confl ict Assessment. // Global Governance. 2009. Vol. 15, № 4. P. 485–504.
7. Werrell C., Femia F. Climate Change Raises Confl ict Con- cerns // The UNESCO Courier. 2018, 29 March.
8. Gilbert J., Sena K. Litigating Indigenous Peoples’ Cultural Rights: Comparative Analysis of Kenya and Uganda // African Studies. 2018. Vol. 77, № 2. P. 204–222
9. Killean R., Dempster L. Green Transitional Justice. 1st ed. London: Routledge, 2025.
10. UNEP & ICTJ Report, Environmental Justice in Transi- tional Contexts. 2020.
11. Drumbl M.A. Accountability for Property Crimes and Environmental War Crimes: Prosecution, Litigation, and Development. New York: ICTJ, 2009. URL: https://www.ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-Development-PropertyCrimes-FullPaper-2009-English.pd (дата звернення: 23.12.2025).
12. UNWCC. Destruction of Polish Forests as a War Crime: Examination of Cases and Listing of War Criminals. In: History of the United Nations War Crimes Commission and the Development of the Laws of War. 1948. P. 496.
13. Gilman R. Expanding Environmental Justice after War: The Need for Universal Jurisdiction over Environmental War Crimes // Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy. 2011. Vol. 22, № 3. P. 447–471.
14. Ybarra M. Living on Scorched Earth: the Political Eco logy of Land Ownership in Guatemala’s Northern Lowlands, University of California eScholarship. 2010. URL: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/54h0559n (дата звернення: 23.12.2025).
15. Braithwaite J. Networked Governance of Freedom and Tyranny. 2019. URL: http://johnbraithwaite.com/wp-con-tent/uploads/2019/02/Networked-governance-of-freedom-and- tyrannny.pdf (дата звернення: 23.12.2025).
16. Truth and Reconciliation Commission, Republic of Korea. Activities of the Past Three Years. 2009. P. 68.
17. ICC. The Prosecutor v Dominic Ongwen, ICC-02/04-01/15, Witness UGA-PCV-0003, Open Session, 23 May 208. P. 81.URL: https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/Transcripts/CR2018_02682.PDF. (дата звернення: 23.12.2025).
18. Pereira R. After the ICC Office of the Prosecutor's 2016 Policy Paper on Case Selection and Prioritisation: Towards an International Crime of Ecocide? // Criminal Law Forum. 2020. Vol. 31, № 2. P. 179–224.
19. Clark J. The COVID-19 pandemic and ecological connectivity // Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2019.
20. Camacho Rincón A., Parra-Gallego G. Addressing environmental damages in contexts of armed conflict through transitional justice in Colombia // International Review of the Red Cross. 2024. Vol. 106 (No. 925). P. 424–449. DOI:10.1017/ S1816383123000553. URL: https://international-review.icrc.org/sites/default/fi les/reviews-pdf/2024-11/addressing-environmental-damages-in-contexts-of-armed-conflict-colombia-925.pdf (дата звернення: 23.12.2025).
21. Згуровський Михайло Захарович. Екологічні наслідки збройних конфліктів у глобальному вимірі // Вісник НАН України. 2025. № 2. URL: https://nasu-periodicals.org.ua/index.php/visnyk/article/view/16478/15605 (дата звернення: 23.12.2025).
Published
2026-02-02
Pages
10-15
Section
SECTION 2 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW; MUNICIPAL LAW