DISCRETIONARY POWERS OF THE JURY IN UKRAINE
Keywords:
evidence admissibility, inner conviction of the jury, presiding judge of the jury, grounds for judicial discretionAbstract
The article deals with the issues of criminal proceedings consideration by the jury in respect to discretionary powers. The features of the jury’s discretion and its distinction from the discretion of professional judges are revealed. The clarifications of the presiding judge are offered to be considered a subsidiary ground for the discretionary decisions adoption by the jury. Particular attention is paid to the jurors participation in deciding on the evidence admissibility. The author proposes ways to eliminate factors that may have a negative effect on the formation of the inner conviction of the jury.
Downloads
Published
2018-06-27
Issue
Section
SECTION 8 CRIMINAL PROCESS AND FORENSIC SCIENCE; FORENSIC EXAMINATIO